When I became a Guild member back in 2006, I cared about one thing: writing my script. I finally had the opportunity, I desperately needed the money, and I signed up and got to work without so much as going to new member orientation.   

But as fate would have it, work screeched to a halt for the 2007 Strike, and  I found my not-orientated self and my extremely-happy-about-it dog on the picket lines almost immediately. I soon met a family of fellow writers I never expected to have. When I faced not getting paid while we were on strike, I discovered that the Guild would actually lend me survival money, even though I’d only been a member for a little while. By the time the strike was over I’d been given a head-first education in how the MBA worked, what solidarity feels like, and most importantly, what sort of forces we, as writers, are up against.   

I still didn’t know then how hard it can sometimes be to get paid by a studio, even when no one’s on strike. I didn’t know just how much of my career would be consumed with chasing jobs, pitching jobs, with doing so very much work in order to just get to  do  the work. I didn’t know how short our working careers can be. And I had  no  idea how far from the MBA ideal industry practice can be: the free work, the mud-wrestling style pitch-fests, the rewrites and producer passes presented almost as loyalty tests to a writer. I certainly had no idea how hard it can sometimes be to get credit when credit is due.   

Twelve years later, I’ve seen pretty clearly that the shelters the Guild provides our members – from the simple protections of the MBA to the absolutely essential Health and Pension plans – are under ongoing tactical siege from the corporations and conglomerates our writing ultimately profits. The basic things we ask for – be it income parity, diversity in the workplace, paid parental leave, keeping our pension and health plans viable – are  personal  to every one of us.  But for the companies on the other side of the table, with their hired negotiators and teams of lawyers, it is purely a matter of accounting, of profit and loss and bottom lines. That’s not just at the negotiating table; that’s the state of play over the life of our careers.   


I’ve loved working as a new member mentor and a Strike Authorization captain, but it wasn’t until recently that I ever considered running for Board. As a writer, I’ve always liked to believe that the best way to make real change in the world is to tell good stories, and leave the politics to politicians. But then a funny thing happened. 

In the run-up to last year’s Strike Authorization Vote, at a members-only discussion meeting, the talk turned to the recent presidential election. Members were reasonably worried, angry, and venting. Then, one of our members got up and made an interesting statement: They said they felt that our union should “not be involved in politics.”  

The enormity of error in that statement really struck me. The Guild isn’t affiliated with any political party – but we are a  union.  Our political affiliation is with workers, and we stand in solidarity with workers and those who defend them, everywhere. And I realized that just being angry or afraid isn’t enough –  each of us has to work harder to protect our rights, and not leave the fight to others. And our Guild does need us. 

Since then, we find ourselves in a rapidly changing world, where workers’ rights and the organizations which protect them are under strategic assault on a national scale. The Net Neutrality which our Guild members successfully defended before Congress back in 2016 – an even playing field which enabled the profitable age of New Media – is actively being dismantled, and media conglomerates are turning into monopolies, unchecked. On June 27th of this year, the Supreme Court ruled against unions in Janus v. AFSCME. Unions such as our own could be facing similar attacks in the near future. These “political” things can and will directly affect each and every one of us, and it is imperative that our Guild be strong as we look ahead. It’s no time to hope for the best and let other people do the heavy lifting. 


We must make sure the Guild is better at communication, specifically by getting those of us who sit at the fringes directly engaged and invested in the long-term health of our Guild. Our current Board has been doing a great job, but I think we can do even better, both in terms of outreach to the membership and education, but also by expanding our digital presence to interface better with both members and the public. It was easy to see in the run-up to the Strike Authorization that as strong as we were internally, the stories in the media were still largely shaped by the vagaries of entertainment journalism. As writers, we are supposed to be good at crafting narratives! I believe there is still a dangerous gap between how strong our Guild can be and how it is perceived, both by our own membership as well as the rest of the world. 

As important as it is to work on our visibility, we also have to press on in efforts to address the abject imbalances wrought by sexism, racism, and homophobia in our industry. As a gay member of the Guild I’ve been thrilled to see real change on all fronts of diversity in our industry over the last decade, thanks in part to the hard work of our Guild’s action committees. But we have further to go: paid parental leave, and ending workplace harassment are key issues I want to help take up. We need to find solutions well in advance of the negotiating table. These things should be non-negotiable. 


Currently, our Health and Pension plan is in the "green,” but other unions have foreseeable issues with multi-employer plans which could have major consequences for the future of our own plan. We must protect our pensions against an increasingly uncertain future by supporting our Political Action Committee’s efforts to monitor, plan for, and address legal challenges in our future.  As we have seen, we no longer are merely facing off with our employers, we are facing a mounting hostile, political and moneyed attack on all unions on a national scale. Our pension and health must be defended, and we have to understand that political planning is part of financial planning. I’ll do everything I can to help increase the support and visibility of our PAC with an eye to taking more political action in the future to defend our Guild and unions everywhere. 


As a feature screenwriter, I’ve had a front-row seat at the death of the three-step deal, and I’ve seen the sad result: infinite-revision-round 1-step deals which fail to produce good work. The diminishing quantity and variety of studio features are putting increased pressure on writers to produce more free work in the form of multiple pitches in a revolving-door environment, if not outright written work on the side. We have to respond as a unified front to help correct course, and I believe my voice will be of real use in these efforts.  

I’m also someone who has seen both good and very bad outcomes in our credit arbitration process. I served on the committee to rewrite the Screen Credits Manual (which is much improved, I’m happy to say), but I know we can go much further. Some of our most talented and visible members have essentially quit the union – going “financial core” –  over the severity of the problem. It weakens us as a Guild. I’m going to help with renewed efforts to reach out to the membership and figure out the best way to improve or change our arbitration process. Our current practice favors writers who have been through the process before, resulting in writers with screen credits accruing even more screen credits. The path to credit should be easier and the possibilities for credit should be expanded. People on our board are working on this and I will join in and work for a better system. Any progress would be good and I’m going to fight, very hard, to see that progress is made. 


It’s been 42 years since we were at the table with our representatives, and I like to believe that they will be just as interested in the long-term health of our industry and the happiness of their clients as we are. We  must  update business practices to reflect a wholly changed media landscape: In 1976 we could scarcely have predicted the position of what was once called “television” in the world today, and TV writers and showrunners need a better deal and better protections that reflect the business as it is practiced now. Our industry is in the middle of a golden age of long form content right now, which our Guild is  largely  responsible for, by fighting for and winning New Media coverage back in 2007, as well as by being the ones creating and producing the content itself.  By the time we sit down to negotiate, I want both sides to know we share the same goal: a sustainable business which is fair for everyone. If we can’t figure out the path together, I want our membership prepared to fight to make the changes we are desperately owed. 


Narrowly averting a strike over the 2017 MBA was a major win for our Guild. In the wake of the 2007 Strike, the industry narrative was that the WGA had “lost” – which was far from true – and this had a huge psychological effect on the membership. So many of our members brought up the 2007 Strike as if it had been a failure. It was disheartening to hear the AMPTP disinformation repeated by fellow writers. But after a lot of hard work we authorized the vote by 96.3%, sending the strong clear message that we were united and strong and not about to back down.   

I believe our Guild’s position in the industry is ascendant, and I strongly believe we, as united writers, have a great deal more power today  than we think we do. Looking forward to 2020, we must all begin working  now  to strengthen our union, increase our visibility, educate our membership and the industry at large, and find new ways to increase solidarity with our sister Guilds in advance of the coming negotiations. We can forge a unified and coherent front for everyone working in our industry. The truth is: A strong Guild can win without a fight. 

I truly believe that the responsibility of defining the future of our industry will fall largely to us, and I want us to be equal to the task. I know we are. I want to get to work now.